Gay People Should Not Be Married Because It’s Not Traditional

I have heard countless interviewees on the news lately claiming that the reason homosexuals should not be allowed to marry is because “we want to keep marriage traditional, all we want is to continue with the way it has always been.” This seems to be the prevailing argument. Most people opposed to gay marriage seem to feel that this is a justified statement, or at least that it’s better than outright declaring their disdain or bigotry towards people who are gay.

I am a middle class white man, raised in a Christian home, which puts me in the majority majority of majorities in the United States of America. I would like to address my fellow Americans who firmly believe that we should not break with tradition, one group at a time. Let’s review what tradition has done for humanity:

To those American Blacks opposed:

Sixty years ago you were considered filthy, less than human, so much so that whites wouldn’t even drink water from the same source as you. One hundred fifty years ago you would have been slaves, nothing more than possessions, only as valuable as the amount of work you could produce. Should America have stuck with that tradition? You argue that “the people have spoken” as the majority of Californians have decided that gays should not be married. Blacks never were and still today are not a majority, so it was a white majority who was forced to accept the (very real) fact that blacks are equal to whites. Did the nation get that wrong?

To those Asian Americans opposed:

You were worked to death to build our railroads. We imprisoned you even while we were fighting against Germany for doing the same to the Jews. Now many of you are among our most prolific, skilled and educated. Should we not have let that happen? Should we put you to work to build our upcoming new high speed railroads? That is what keeping with tradition would mean.

To those Mexican immigrants and all other latecomers to the party opposed:

We’re happy to have you clean our hotel rooms, look after our children and build our skyscrapers, but only for a meager penance. And what do we give you in return? You’re treated as criminals, locked up or deported. Should we continue with that tradition as well?

To those Christians, those Catholics, opposed:

I am sorry to say that I believe you are the root of this evil. It is your blind faith in a book so many of you haven’t even read that puts you in such opposition to what “God” says is a sin. If tradition were to be held true, you would all deserve a solid death at the hands of Romans, each and every one of you stoned or crucified. How can a people of such persecution now turn their backs on the greatest man of their teaching? What would Jesus do? He loved whores, mingled with lepers and thieves. His main crew was a bunch of rowdy sailors. Do you honestly believe he would find opposition to people living happily, as his Father made them?

To those Jews opposed:

C’mon, wtf here? For God’s chosen people you’ve obviously been given the bunk ticket. After all of the slavery, holocaust, stereotyping, how can you sleep at night wishing unhappiness on others?

Apart from perhaps my own race and gender, nearly every type of American today has had ancestors or has personally been kept down by a majority who were not in the moral right. Sadly, it seems that the majority never are in the moral right. We’re just the majority, so it’s easy to believe we’re right.

It’s time to stop this silliness. My children will look back on our generation and, just as we look back on the Civil Rights movement of the ’60s, wonder how in the world we were so ignorant of the obvious reality. I only hope that they’ll also be able to look back, as I can on my parents, and say “Well, at least they had the good sense to come around and realize.”

People are Talking, Talking 'bout People

  1. Superbly put.

  2. Thank you ma’am.

  3. This is superbly and uniquely worded. Nice job with this, nathan. I’m glad I stumbled upon your website – interesting story.

  4. Very well put, thank you for writing this!

  5. Indeed!
    Oh and, Happy Birthday!!!

  6. Nathen,

    I am sorry to hear you disgracefully using the name Christian. God OBVIOUSLY talks about one woman one man and that homosexuality is lustfull shamefull and indecent. look up Leviticus 18:22 and see what He says. Yes Jesus did hang around the taxcollectors and the sinners, but He hung out there to tech them to turn there ways. “Hate the sin, love the sinner” His goal was to save the sinners and give them a second chance, not to congratulate them on their sin. Please think about it. I tell you this not in hate, but to open your eyes.

    Sandra Parkway

  7. I can appreciate your opinions, Sandra, fer sher. Your email address hints at your true beliefs, of course. :)

    Regardless of Jesus’ tech savvy, I still don’t buy it. If the Big Guy’s baby boy was who the Bible makes him out to be, I can’t imagine he’d be against love in any form.

    And the Old and New Testies have quite a few contradictions, so a verse from Leviticus might not hold true post BC, right? Feel free to send me any input on what the Creator decided later, as I’d love to read it. Hyperlinks are best, but I’ll accept skywriting.

Your Turn

Next at bat? Well that'd be you! Swing away...

Your email address will not be published.