Firefox vs. Safari, the Sequel

March 13, 2008 5:33pm

I had posted about my ongoing debate on whether to use Firefox or Safari as my main browser. I had a look at both Firefox 2.0.0.12 and Safari 3.0.4 in Activity Monitor on my Mac (Activity Monitor, for you Windowsers, is similar to Task Manager).

With four tabs open on each — Gmail, Harvest (time tracking software), Google Calendar and Google Reader — Safari was using around 90MB of RAM and Firefox only 74MB. Interesting, as I have a bunch of plugins installed on Firefox and only one in Safari. Safari is still faster, perhaps because of the fact that it’s using more RAM, I don’t know about such things.

Up Next: Anime and Graffiti are not Art

Discussion

Jake 13 Mar 2008

I used to use FF on the Mac exclusively, but I’ve since switched. I couldn’t handle the slowness once I learned how much faster Safari was.

I still dip into FF from time to time when I’m trying to figure out some tricky problem and need to leverage the plug-ins, but I’ve found that Safari’s Web Inspector, plus the X-Ray and MRI bookmarklets satisfy most of my needs.

When I need to check a layout in the Gecko engine, Camino, not FF, gets the call.

Reply
nathan 13 Mar 2008

Yeah, Firefox’s Web Developer Plugin is so solid…I haven’t really figured out Safari’s Inspector yet. I mostly just use the Web Developer FF Plugin to outline current element.

Reply
Mike Schroepfer 14 Mar 2008

You should really check out Firefox 3 Beta 4, it uses less memory and is faster than Safari:

http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/firefox-3-beta-4-review/

Reply
nathan 14 Mar 2008

I’m excited for Firefox 3 to come out, but I’m worried about upgrading until it’s ready to roll. As a Web designer I feel like I need to have the most common version available to everyone, you know?

Reply